What if the model is wrong?
6 published papers3 patents5 yrs building ML for financial intelligence
I build ML systems that turn noisy data into decisions — and I obsess over the question underneath all of it: what would have happened otherwise?
A live snapshot — updated every few weeks. Proof I'm a person, not a PDF.
Six projects — each one asking the same question from a different angle.
Published work and drafts in progress — each one a walkthrough of how the production work and the research feed back into each other.
I build ML systems that turn messy financial data into decisions — pricing intelligence, knowledge graphs, agentic platforms, and the research that feeds back into them.
Over the last five years I've shipped pricing models that drove eight-figure revenue impact, a document-extraction pipeline running at 97% field accuracy, multi-agent automations now used by 200+ analysts daily, and a news-classification system that processes cyber and financial events end-to-end every day. My research — six peer-reviewed papers, including first-author work on multimodal RAG and structured spreadsheet retrieval — sits one step ahead of the production work.
The question I keep coming back to is the one this site is named after: what would have happened otherwise? Most of what's interesting in ML lives in that gap — between the decision you made and the one you didn't.
Working notes, paper takes, and counterfactual reflections on what's happening in ML.
The kind of writing that survives the LLM era is the kind only a real practitioner can write — opinionated takes on new research, lessons from production systems, and "what if this paper is wrong?" reflections. Subscribe below to catch the first one.
Things I'm building to give back — reading lists, paper walkthroughs, and interactive explainers on the topics I work on most.
An interactive explainer on incremental KG maintenance — what changes, what stays, and how to know.
How simulation-driven pricing actually works in production — willingness-to-pay, scenario analysis, and the counterfactual at the heart of it.
Building churn models that look back to look forward — what 30 years of history teaches a 3-month prediction.